55:34
That’s exactly a minute faster than my previous best time for the hill climbing circuit (the old one, not the expanded one with Capron, Burlingame, etc.) Of course that’s not the whole story: the other time I was holding back on the first lap in preparation to give it everything on the second lap, which I never did, instead opting to do the east side hill loop. But today’s time could have been much better if I hadn’t had abnormally bad luck making some of my turns – I lost close to a minute waiting to turn onto Great Road from 123, another 30 seconds or so waiting for the light at 116 and probably a minute waiting to cross RT 7 on Harris. I can’t say for sure that I didn’t lose time in those spots (or other spots) on my previous runs, but today definitely seemed worse than normal.
doing the loop with an eye to overall time is a bit of a weird experience for me. If I ride at my own pace, I tend to take it easy on the flats and descents and punch it on the hills. Or, if I ride it with others, I try to duck out of the wind and recover as much as possible so that I can have as much energy as possible for the climbs. Today, I wanted to put down as good a time as possible in those in-between sections to allow myself a buffer in my average speed when I hit the climbs. The end result was that I climbed all of the climbs a bit slower than I would under other circumstances. The only exceptions were the two easy climbs (not even rated on my hills page) on Dexter Rock and 116. I usually shift into the little ring for those, but today I was able to power through them in the big ring. The question of course is whether I would have done better by arriving at the climbs with a slightly lower average speed but better legs to sprint up the hills? I’d also be very curious to see how a different type of rider would handle the same course. My guess is that even though there’s a lot of climbing, Gewilli would very easily ride the non-climbing and descending parts quick enough to post a much better time for the circuit.
gewilli on 25 Sep 2008 at 11:39 am #
well..
there is a little rumor that a friend of mine from michigan has challenged me to climb Mt Washington next summer…
so…
we’ll have to see, I might need to morph into a lanky mt goat by August and you and me might get to do some solid hill climbing…
after cross season of course
brent on 25 Sep 2008 at 11:55 am #
ooh, yay. If so, you don’t want Washington to be your first hill-climb race, so maybe I’ll be able to get some company for Whiteface, Okemo, Ascutney, etc…
Or at least I’ll be able to convince you to come along on excursions up to Monadnock and Mount Tom?
khalid on 26 Sep 2008 at 2:59 am #
wow….55:34 eh? and when I saw the title of that post, I thought that those were your new gears….53/39 didn’t cut it eh?
every try a heart rate monitor? it changes training a lot…of course if you really wanted to throw down you could roll a power meter, but that’s excessive i’d say. anyway for tt’s a hrm could help you make sure that on the climbs you don’t go over and into the red (which would in the long run slow you down) and in the flat sections it can help prevent you from being lazy. ideally you’d put for the same _effort_ on all sections, which means you’d go slower up hill, faster on the flats. does that make sense? i more consistent effort, rather than hammer up, recover on the flats, is much more effective.
gewilli on 26 Sep 2008 at 9:10 am #
yeah that’s a distinct possibility brent…
heck how hard can a hill climb be… ya keep peddling till ya hit the top
brent on 26 Sep 2008 at 10:07 am #
Gewilli…well, sometimes you have to get off and walk! though from your riding style/general demeanor, I expect you’d snap your chain in half before you let that happen…but then you’re still walking…
Khalid…nope, never used a HR (or power of course–ever notice that when typing “power” on a keyboard, it’s really easy to make a typo and write “poser”). What would be the fun of that? Then I’d be able to replace all this idle speculation with hard numbers. So, essentially, I was saying the same thing…as I increased my speed elsewhere on the loop, I noticed a drop in my climbing speed, which is of course what you’d expect, and certainly seems like more efficient riding. It just doesn’t feel as good to see your speed drop abnormally and need to shift into lower gears that you can usually stay out of…
Brentani’s Cycling Blog » 58:45 on 05 Apr 2009 at 11:13 am #
[...] today on the hill circuit was 58:45, even with perfect luck on every light and intersection. (My previous best was 55:26.) There was a pretty tough wind from the northwest, but I couldn’t decide if that [...]
Brentani’s Cycling Blog » 53:45 on 08 Jul 2009 at 12:39 pm #
[...] perhaps I should say “53:45, bitches.” That’s right, I beat my previous best time on the hill climbing circuit by almost two minutes. And I beat the time I posted back in April [...]
Dave Kellogg on 18 Sep 2009 at 11:24 am #
Plain Meeting House road should be added to the list, probably in the top ten. It is off route 102 in Exeter near the CT border. One mile, averaging about 12%. Elevation gain of about 500 ft.
brent on 18 Sep 2009 at 12:17 pm #
Thanks Dave! If you’re not exaggerating about it, it sounds like that hill should not only be added to the top 10, but probably the number 1 slot. 1 mile at 12% is good enough to be a destination hill (like Blue Hill, Mount Tom, etc), so I’ll be down to check it out soon. If it isn’t obvious, I don’t know southern RI very well…
brent on 18 Sep 2009 at 12:51 pm #
ok, well, I definitely need to go down and check it out for myself, and thankfully it isn’t as far south as I had imagined, so I can ride there from PVD. But according to veloroutes data, it looks like it’s closer to 8% average, topping out at 12-15% near the top. Still a very nice hill, and still in contention for top 5. Probably not hard enough to take away the top slot from Bowen or Blue Hill, but nice all the same.
http://www.brentacol.com/view.php?hill_id=122